Rather than distinguishing between "published" (sense 1 of the Glossary), and "published for purposes of zoological nomenclature" should we adopt the botanical terminology of "effectively published".

In the diagram on page 123 of the Code, another level would be added, with "Published" divided into "effectively published" and "not effectively published". The "effectively published" side would have "available", "unavailable" and "suppressed" coming from it. "Not effectively published" would be for e-works before 2010 and CD-ROM/DVD without the claimer of Article 8.6. (Gary Rosenberg, 12 Nov 2008)


Preamble | Articles 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 | Glossary Appendices Constitution


Markup
Chris   Stellar work there evnyeore. I'll keep on reading. http://klrjhwpnm.com [url=http://bbymaf.com]bbymaf[/url] [link=http://lcmwdn.com]lcmwdn[/link]
2016-06-28 22:37:54 X
Lizabeth   I'm <a href="http://zvnbljbf.com">rellay</a> into it, thanks for this great stuff!
2016-06-28 15:14:14 X
Lucy   Yup, that'll do it. You have my apctopiarien. http://yttotnt.com [url=http://ultttzstb.com]ultttzstb[/url] [link=http://fnypggxpr.com]fnypggxpr[/link]
2016-06-27 20:19:31 X
Theresa   Time to face the music armed with this great <a href="http://dzvukaey.com">inaimrftoon.</a>
2016-06-27 13:23:53 X
Della   Też mam takÄ… podobnÄ… BasiÄ™ znajomÄ…, która o kwasach opowiada czasem z takÄ… pasjÄ… :)  podziwiam Was obie!Kwasów siÄ™ nie bojÄ™, ale chyba faktycznie na raz wiÄ™cej niż jednego rageobarrwabo badylka nie zjem :)Tarta super!
2016-06-26 19:22:39 X