DO NOT EDIT THIS PAGE!! This page is automatically generated by PageComment macro.
,0 FranciscoWelterSchultes 2009-10-20 15:00:01 Art. 3. should be modified. "The date 1 January 1758" should be replaced by "31 December 1757". Art. 3.1 should be modified. (1) Clerck's work should be cited as "Svenska Spindlar" because the leading language of Clerck's book was Swedish, Latin was used as the second language. (2) Clerck's work should be given with the date of publication 31 December 1757, Linnaeus's Systema Naturae, 10th Edition with the date 1 January 1758. (3) the passage "Names in the latter have precedence over names in the former, but" should be deleted. Art. 3.2 should be modified. "No name or nomenclatural act published before 1 January 1758" should be replaced by "No name or nomenclatural act published before 1 January 1758 (except Clerck's Svenska Spindlar)..." This leads to all publications prior to 1758 being not recognized as binominal, with Clerck 1757 as the single one exception. On Clerck's book is printed the date 1757, which means that following the rules 31 Dec 1757 has to be seen as the nomenclaturally relevant date of publication. There is no need to begin zoological nomenclature with a confusion forcing 1757 to mean 1758, and to change historic realities in the spirit of the Soviet government. There is a very basic rule in zoological nomenclature that the date for a name must always be the true date of publication as given in the work itself or as derived from secondary sources. There is no doubt that Clerck's work appeared in 1757, and Linnaeus 1758 referred to it many times in his 10th edition of Systema Naturae. There is no need to cause confusion among taxonomists and conflicts within the Code by unnecessarily deviating from this very basic rule. In fact this article in its present version and the duplication of the 1758 year for spider names has immediately led to confusions after 2000, taxonomists became uncertain about which work - Clerck or Linnaeus - had priority (Case 3371, Opinion 2224 - a very chaotic decision in which the plural of a generic name was defined to be a family name and where an incorrect subsequent spelling for a genus was defined to be a new name; both actions were not necessary for maintaining stability). Still today Clerck's spider names are frequently cited with the 1757 date, and zoology does not lose its face if this true date of publication for Clerck's work is officially recognized. Arachnologists have good reasons to recognize this work as the one and only officially recognized binominal pre-Linnean work. The spiders were very accurately described and figured, and Clerck's 1757 work represents a very good example for zoological nomenclature. The leading language was Swedish, a modern language, and not Latin (which was a translation of the Swedish text in smaller font). In the 1750s more than 50 % of the zoological publications were published in a variety of modern langauges, Latin had already decreased down to 40 %. This book is a very special publication in zoological nomenclature, it deserves to be recognized as a little treasure in the light of its historical screen and significance, and not as something that has to be hidden away or obscured by a questionable method reminding similarly questionable methods applied in political contexts.
,on Keyla 2016-01-11 16:27:22 This is the ideal answer. Evneroye should read this
,on Lilly 2016-01-12 08:57:47 Keep it coming, <a href="http://ufapxbjjptk.com">wrirste,</a> this is good stuff.
,on Rangler 2016-01-20 21:51:31 I have been so bediwlered in the past but now it all makes sense! http://swtxogiz.com [url=http://oieizgrbq.com]oieizgrbq[/url] [link=http://skxveigb.com]skxveigb[/link]
,on Lissa 2016-05-01 22:40:03 Querida, vou encomendar os M&M´s pelo site e sou eu que vou fazer a embalagem.Qual vc acha que fica mais barata? A granel?Muito obnioada.BjgsMariara
,on Deejay 2016-05-02 11:19:42 The phone is cute but my 9 month old likes to chew on it more than dialing the phone. The music does get his attention sometimes. But you have to play with it yourself so he’d know what to do with it. Overall, my son knows the difference between my phone and this toy <a href="http://ocdkgrxtuj.com">ph&08o#e23n;</a> and he’s more interested in my phone.
,on Marsue 2016-05-03 19:19:33 My ring….I got in Ec8;Ior…a.d&#u217;m also wearing a wrist ornament that I got from a young Kuna girl in Panama, these things along with a token trinket or stone which I’ve picked up in every country are going to be placed in a tide pool on the South Shore of TDF, plus of course some of my Fathers Ashes which I have carried for 14,000 miles…. so far…..Thanx for all the attention everybody!!!!!Yours Truly, Topher http://mxjhsvkknvt.com [url=http://dhcwgf.com]dhcwgf[/url] [link=http://cbnmhdults.com]cbnmhdults[/link]
,on Caroline 2016-05-04 02:21:13 Can't think of a book, but the best irony I've seen was in the movie The Usual Suspect when the bad guy was right there the whole time and no one knew it. (Sorry, hope I <a href="http://uprtzm.com">did&3#n9;t</a> just ruin the movie for you!)
,on Rosie 2016-05-06 16:34:23 The CPI is calculated by the BLS and is NOT used to calculate real GDP or its cosonpentm. The GDP deflator is used by the BEA to adjust for inflation, not the CPI. http://uqrzwcd.com [url=http://tummhzoob.com]tummhzoob[/url] [link=http://lbwutu.com]lbwutu[/link]
,1 Mark 2016-05-12 00:01:14 3oOnWL http://www.y7YwKx7Pm6OnyJvolbcwrWdoEnRF29pb.com
,on Peggy 2016-06-26 19:08:40 Wow that was unusual. I just wrote an extremely long comment but after I clicked submit my comment di&72#8d1n;t appear. Grrrr… well I’m not writing all that over again. Anyhow, just wanted to say excellent blog!